|
Students will be evaluated on the extent to which their
assignment and classroom work shows evidence of
fulfilling the course objectives. Timeliness, accuracy of information, coherence, clarity of
presentation, utilization of readings, critical thinking, comprehensiveness and creativity will
be considered when evaluating superior performance. Additionally, the depth and breadth of
knowledge gained and evidence of reflection thereon are important performance criteria.
Contribution of each activity to the total evaluation:
Forum Discussion
15% - Minimum of 3 due each week
Reading Reaction:
25% - Due by end of semester
Literature Review:
25% - Due by end of semester
Scholarly Paper/Project: 35% - Due by end of semester
Not Graded:
1) A written journal will be kept while reading the texts.
This journal will be used by the student as a way of organizing
thoughts while reading, taking notes on the literature, and for posing any
questions for discussion and is not to be turned in for credit.
2) The Hoover book will serve to shape discussion and serve as a reference
book for the remaining assignments. The
student will draw from each chapter issues or questions for discussion.
3) In consultation with the student’s advisor, the student will develop
the first draft of a degree plan and submit this to their advisor by the end
of the term.
4. As we speak, so we are. Engaging this material requires study, reflection
and interpretation. The questions we ask are often more instructive than the answers
given. Keep a list and define concepts, methods and theories the ideas
of social science - cross reference to your journal or annotated
bibliography
|
Regis >
Social Science > Syllabus
>
Grading