Tacitus was a fierce critic of Nero, and modern scholars have questioned the reliability of
his account of this notorious Roman Emperor; but the following passage from his Annals is
famous because it is one of the first mentions in a non-Christian source of Christianity. In 64 CE
Rome underwent a catastrophic fire, which some believed had been set at the orders of the emperor
himself. Tacitus claims that Nero tried to shift the blame to the unpopular Christians, though other
sources indicate that their persecution may have been unconnected to the fire. It is not clear
exactly why many Romans so detested the new believers, though Christians were often confused with
Jews, who were accused of being rebellious (with some reason, since the Jews of Judaea more than
once created insurrections against the Roman provincial government) and lazy (since they rested on
the Sabbath). Scandalous rumors about obscene Christian rituals circulated at an early date, and we
know that they were accused of disloyalty because of their refusal to perform the token ritual
acknowledging the divine status of the Emperor, viewed by most citizens as little different from a
modern flag salute. If Tacitus shows sympathy for them, it is because he detests Nero more. Whatever
their exact cause this early persecution and later ones made a profound impact on the Christian
Church, and bequeathed a legacy of colorful tales of martyred saints who were celebrated in story,
song, and art for the next two millenia, long after the Church had triumphed over its opponents.
What were the main accusations brought against the Christians?
Translated by Richard Hooker